The Reason Why Unemployment Destroys Our Economic Potential

During the 1930s, the Great Depression plagued Americans with a 25% jobless society. At that time, nearly one-third of the U.S production capacity was sitting idle. Since then, Americans have faced a number of smaller hits to the economy; the most recent in 2001 (not including 2008!). In that year alone, unemployment increased by about 2 million workers.

Why is unemployment so devastating to an economy?

Certainly the U.S. isn’t the only country that faces these hardships. Since 1995 there have been several larger nations that have faced difficult times of increased unemployment, including Japan, Argentina, South Korea, Mexico, and Germany. Unemployment for economies is a global issue! We should all be concerned.

Have you even wondered as you’ve listened to political debates or new reports why a huge loss in jobs is such a big deal to a nation?

The quick answer might be that you people suffer in financial hardship, or that the economy just plain won’t be as strong. But why?

It all goes back to the production possibilities model that is often spoken about by economists. Typically, it will graphically create a curve that displays the different combinations of goods and services that our society can produce in a fully employed economy. In other words, if everybody has a job, how much can we potentially do, as a whole, to improve the quality of life in a nation by providing more goods and services.

And, again, from an economic standpoint- the more goods and services produced, the lower the cost to us!

Unemployment kills an economy because of the missed opportunity of more output! And that output will make more goods and services available to the average American, which as a whole will bring down the cost of those goods and services!

Does unemployment effect the employed?

Absolutely! Be concerned and be aware of who you put in office for this reason; we want individuals who know and understand economics because that will directly impact our lives.

Unemployment As a Teenager

This post will discuss the negative aspects of being unemployed at my age. Most people would say “I don’t want a job,” or “I will only work 5 hours a week,” or even “why work? My parents buy me everything.” To them I would say, you’re an idiot. If you do not want a job, then you are a nincompoop. This is a short list of things that jobs give you.

The first and most obvious thing is MONEY. The world is run by money, and you need it to do anything at all. To the people who get everything from their parents, that will not last forever. If and when you go to college will your parents be buying all of your food, books, housing, and entertainment? Most likely not. So, when you are sitting in your dorm, broke, wanting to do things, too bad. You have no job, you have no money, you have no things. Because I do not have a job, I have almost no money. What does this mean for me? Not too much, I still live with my family, and the basics are provided. But I want a car! I can’t afford a car, let alone insurance, gas, and anything else that may come up. That is an enormous expense. In addition to that, I would like to go to Germany next summer. Without money, all of these things are impossible.

The second thing, and the one that is fundamentally more important, is that it helps develop one’s responsibility. I have nothing to do with my life, trust me. You would think because I have so much time that I am constantly caught-up with all of my work at school. This is not as true as one would think. I almost never study, and do the least amount of homework possible. On the other hand, some of my friends are in sports every day of the week, AND they have a job. Yet they are in higher level classes than me, study more, and get similar, if not better grades. This makes no sense at all to me, but I would guess all of these things give them better organizational skills or something like that.

The third thing is the stigma related with not having these things. The high school I go to has a broad spectrum of students, come from every economic background imaginable. There are students who are fighting poverty and trying to get something to eat, but there are other students who are given BMW’s for their birthdays. I come from somewhere in the middle. I never have to worry about food, housing, or heat, but my parents don’t buy me cars. I don’t have a job, so guess what else I lack? I’ll give you a hint, it has 4 wheels, and rhymes with bar. A surprising side-effect of this is my embarrassment after the final bell rings. Most people either have a ride home with a friend, or just walks to the parking lot, gets in the car, and drives home. What do I do? I call my mom and wait. Maybe its my near-0 self-esteem, but I feel ashamed every time somebody asks me “Do you have a ride home?” and I have to say “Yeah, my mom is on her way.” That is just one example of things you may feel without a job.

The last thing is your feelings for yourself. For reasons I cannot expand upon, I have been declined from 6 different positions over the past few months. These include: McDonald’s twice, Culver’s, Rocky Rococco’s, Rosatis’s, and Pick and Save. My friends give me shit for this, and truth-be-told, its hilarious. But when you get down to it, and think about your poor, jobless ass, it is not funny at all. One of my favorite things to say is “I am so dumb I got turned down from McDonald’s twice,” until I think about it. Then it just makes me sad. The only thing I can think of is that someone that is older applied for a job, or everyone else got a recommendation from someone who works there. That is just how the world works I suppose, it is all about who you know. Who knows, maybe 7th time is the charm?

As you can tell, unemployment sucks. If anyone sees this and would like to give me tips, or more reasons supporting the conclusion, type it in the comments. Thanks for reading y’all.

Europe’s Economy: The Challenges of High Unemployment and Sluggish Economic Growth

Millions of European citizens find themselves in a fantasyland of “wanting to keep things the way they were” even as the fundamentals of the European style of government continue to crumble. Europe simply cannot have things the way they were.

Nevertheless, millions of residents of “Old Europe,” in particular France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, refuse to accept the reality of enhanced global competition and unaffordable government-sponsored social programs. Their anxieties are many, including a substantial outsourcing of jobs, persistently high unemployment, a weak educational system, an aging society, a declining overall population, and new global competitors, especially China, India, and numerous Eastern European countries.

Europeans face a barrage of issues, with limited means to escape economic sluggishness and high unemployment. Such was not always the case. European countries traditionally found many of their prized companies as formidable competitors. Many remain in this role, perhaps led by the German automakers. Reasonable levels of economic growth and low jobless rates were the norm in prior decades, but no longer.

The European Union

The broad objectives of blending together a unified Europe included the ability to compete globally as a more cohesive economic unit. Many successes were found, including the ability to dramatically reduce red tape and hassles involving trade among European nations.

The creation of a single currency for the European community has had mixed results. The euro currency enjoys broad acceptance as a major global currency (second only to the dollar). However, the loss of monetary flexibility among many of the smaller nations within Europe has been a major frustration.

Tomorrow in Europe

Growth prospects are modest as the European model of extensive social welfare, protected industries, high taxes, and few free market ideas remain its foundation. Companies by the thousands have shed jobs in Old Europe even as they added jobs in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, and Hungary.

Fewer Bodies

Europe also faces an actual decline in population. The European birth rate (as in Japan and Russia) is well below the “replacement rate” of 2.1 children for each woman of childbearing age. For Western Europe as a whole, the birth rate is now 1.5, with lower rates in Old Europe. A continuation of such low birth rates for years to come would lead overall populations sharply lower, and threaten the ability of taxpayers to finance future government social spending.

In all likelihood, stronger overall population growth is expected. However, it will be the result of higher birth rates in poorer Eurozone countries and stronger migration (both legal and illegal) into France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and so on.

High levels of Eurozone unemployment compensation and welfare have traditionally provided many citizens with an ability to survive while lacking jobs. Many have lived at public expense for years. Average jobless rates of 9 percent to 10 percent in Germany and 8 percent to 9 percent in France compare to rates half as high in the United States and Japan.

Life in Old Europe includes the “haves” (older high-wage unionized workers) and the “have nots” (millions of younger people who will move between limited employment opportunities and more “comfortable” jobless benefits than found in most parts of the world)–not a pretty picture for the young.

Eurozone Expansion

Bigger is better–or so has been the mindset of European leaders. The European Union comprised 12 member nations a decade ago. Membership today is roughly 25 nations, representing more than 450 million people. A cohesive group? Tens of millions of new member citizens speak different languages and represent vastly different cultures, including rising Islamic populations.

Citizens of richer nations seethe at the addition of 10 mostly poor nations during the past few years, with rising anxiety about the loss of their higher-wage jobs to those poorer countries which feature much lower wage levels.

Facing Reality

There is a quiet realization building across European political and business circles that in order to be competitive with North American and Pacific Rim companies, European companies must have greater flexibility in terms of hiring/firing practices, more open competition, and wider use of production incentives for workers. Lower tax rates and less government are also viewed as necessary.

Some progress is being made, with more upbeat growth prospects for those nations willing to embrace change. Data also suggests that a greater share of Eurozone growth is coming from rising domestic demand, a favorable development should the euro continue to appreciate versus the dollar in coming years.

The enormous unemployment rate disparity between Europe and the United States/Japan comes down to the issue of the entry and exit of labor in a free market. Pro-union governments and powerful labor unions have distorted the European labor issue. The reality is that once a company hires an additional employee in various countries, it is almost impossible or very costly to ever let them go.

So what do rational European company managers do in this hostile labor environment? They utilize alternatives to new hiring, including more overtime for current workers, greater use of automation, more use of less costly Central European or Pacific Rim labor, and greater investment into non-European companies that operate in more business-friendly locations.

Liberal European governments blame their high unemployment rates on job-reducing technology and increased competition from countries where wages are lower. However, they are unable to explain why unemployment rates in the United States and Great Britain are so much lower–countries subject to the same competitive pressures.

The realities of high unemployment and limited economic growth prospects are finally leading labor leaders to the bargaining table, with particular progress in Germany. German workers in various industries, principally manufacturing, have agreed to greater flexibility in exchange for promises that jobs will be maintained.

German workers are embracing more flexible and longer work weeks. In addition, more and more German and other workers are trading fixed (but declining) bonuses for something commonplace in the Western world–profit sharing. The ability of European nations to enjoy solid growth expectations in coming years is tied in part to such labor flexibility.